This is an AMIEU archive site
Click here for the current AMIEU website
Slaughterer


Slaughterer

Financial Accounts

Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union Victoria Branch Operating Report for 2006/07

Newsletters from Supermarket EBAs 2002-2005


Check out newsletters from the supermarket's 2002/3 EBAs negotiations and implementation. Run your eye down this list and check out newsletters from September 2004 back to October 2002

 

Safeway September 2004


Newsletter for meat rooms in Safeway
September 2004

check it out here

Supermarkets April 2004


SUPERMARKETS APRIL 2004 click here

Supermarkets September 03


The Safeway/ Woolworths,
Coles and BiLo Agreements have
all been
ratified and
remain in force
until 2005/6

Find out about it all.


BiLo April 2003


Enterprise
Bargaining Agreement at BiLo

EBA Coles Myer Vote April 03

Coles EBA Vote

Members in the meat rooms at Coles Myer voted on the proposed Enterprise Bargaining Enterprise. The majority supported the negotiated EBA.

Click here and find out about it.

Safeway Update 2002


Safeway - Industrial Victory

The Victorian Branch of the AMIEU has produced a Newsletter on the Enterprise Bargaining Agreement
negotiations with Safeway.

As is reported in the Disputes section there has been industrial action by Meatworkers at Safeway. Before Safeway came back to the table with a new EBA offer there had been strike action by the people in the meat rooms in thirty stores and public action at ten different stores.

The industrial action convinced Safeway to come back with a different offer. All AMIEU members who are employed at Safeway received a Newsletter in the mail with the details of the new offer and a ballott paper to vote on the offer. You had the right to accept or reject the offer.

The VOTE was overwhelmingly in favour of the EBA offer achieved. 96% of the votes were to support the negotiated EBA.

BiLo and Coles Negotiations 2002


Coles and BiLo Meatrooms - Enterprise Bargaining Agreement negotiations started. There was initially a range of major differences between Coles Myer and the AMIEU.
Click here to find out how negotiations developed. Then check what happened on both Coles Myer EBA and BiLo EBA

ONLINE USERS
Online Users:
Members:
0
Anonymous: 4

   
   
AWAs versus EBAs

Enterprise Bargaining Agreements vs Australian Workplace Agreements

It is unfortunate for some meat workers that they have signed Australian Workplace Agreements. Often workers have signed AWAs for a period of 3 years and are stuck with lesser wages, conditions and entitlements.

 In the AWAs that we have seen there are some common elements:
-
Ordinary hours are regularly 40 hours per week that may be rostered on any days of the week from Monday to Saturday (inclusive) and between 5.00am and midnight;
- Employers get to nominate whether they want any section of the plant on five 8 hour days or four 10 hour days; and
The minimum working hours required to be paid are only 5 hours a day.
 
This means that workers on those AWAs do not get paid penalty rates on evenings or Saturdays whereas most workers on Enterprise Bargaining Agreements do receive penalty rates. Also it means that there are no Rostered Days Off on AWAs.

Extending the hours of work in one day can dramatically increase the risk of injury to workers. For example, jobs that require standing for lengthy periods or forceful or repetitive movements places more strain on muscles and joints, and exposure standards for many hazardous substances are based on 8 hour days.

One of the major entitlements that does not appear in any of the AWAs that we have seen is the right to Make Up Pay. This has a major effect on those who are injured or made ill as a result of work. In all of the enterprise agreements to which AMIEU is a signatory there is a right to make up pay in some form. Even the Federal Award includes make up pay for those workers who receive workers' compensation in Victoria, despite the fact that the Federal Award is far less than AMIEU Agreements.

The impact of there being no Make Up Pay on workers who are on AWAs who are seriously injured or made ill by work is horrific.

Under WorkCover, people who cannot do any work after 13 week, suddenly have cuts in their WorkCover entitlements. Suddenly they are expected to live on 75% of their pre injury average weekly earnings. For example, a labourer on an AWA at Yarrawonga would suddenly get only $322, instead of the $430. A labourer who is covered by an AMIEU agreement would be entitled to make up pay paid by the employer when the WorkCover payment drops to 75% of pre injury average weekly earnings.

The situation is even worse for an AWA worker who is unable to perform pre injury work and whose employer does not (or will not) provide suitable alternative duties. In that instance the WorkCover payments drop to 60% of pre injury average weekly earnings. In the case of a worker who had the $10.75 pay rate quoted above, if Yarrawonga could (or would) not provide duties after 13 weeks, while the worker's doctor certified that the person was not fit to do the original work, but could do something else, the worker would only get $258 gross per week.

When the Kennett government reduced injured workers' weekly payments to 75% or 60% at 13 weeks, they said that it would not hurt workers because of make up pay. The publications of WorkCover say that workers get a top-up from the employer, on make up pay. However this is not true in any AWA that we have seen.

Certainly one of the AWA workers who developed leptospirosis at O'Connor's had pay drop to 75% at 13 weeks despite being totally unfit to do any work. Whilst the AMIEU could not alter the statute that the worker had signed, we were able to make sure that the worker got WorkCover in the first place when O'Connor's tried to refuse the claim.

We believe that workers who are under the AWAs that we have seen are:
Often paid badly compared with our members who have penalty rates for which they bargained collectively;
More likely to be injured than the people who can fight collectively and have Union trained health and safety representatives; and
Much worse off when they are injured or ill as a result of work.

Overall, workers who are on Australian Workplace Agreements are in our industry are severely disadvantaged.


Back


Page registered by Administrator Victorian Branch on 10/10/02 07:03 for topic NEWSLETTER.
This page has been read 5215 times
PrintSend to a friend
© 2002 - oxiigen - life support for business - all rights reserved - POWERED BY CHILLI CMS
Terms and conditions - Privacy Policy

archive site by farnham street neighbourhood learning centre