This is an AMIEU archive site
Click here for the current AMIEU website
Unfair Dismissal


Howard offers token amount for sacked workers

Howard is promising workers who are sacked unlawfully will have access to a $4000 legal fund to fight their dismissal - effectively an admission that workers will be worse off under the new legislation
He outlined the provisions for the handout in Perth on Thursday 29/09/05), which will cover only a fraction of the estimated $25,000 cost of mounting an 'unlawful termination' action in the courts.
Current laws protect workers from 'unfair dismissal' - being sacked for no reason or an unfair reason. Unfair dismissal hearings are conducted by the Australian Industrial Relations Commission, are heard quickly with minimum costs and do not require the presence of lawyers.
Under the proposed legislation up to 4 million Australian workers will be denied this protection and could be forced to go through lengthy court cases to determine if they have been treated unlawfully.
Also, if they lose they could be forced to pay the costs of their former employer.
If the new laws are passed up to 4 million Australian workers will have no protection from unfair dismissal.

Casuals


Casuals are conscripts, not volunteers

 

Most casual workers are not casual by choice and would prefer to be in ongoing employment, according to a new report.

 

Find out more about the report findings

Good News for Labour Hire Workers


ASU wins right to permanency for labour hire employees

In a ground breaking decision handed down recently by the South Australian Industrial Commission the ASU SA & NT Branch has won a long running battle to gain the right for long term labour hire employees to convert to permanent employment.

In his decision Commissioner Dangerfield found that two ASU members employed by Direct Personnel to work for Transport SA on a long term basis, were entitled to be considered permanent employees and therefore gain access to Award entitlements such as paid annual leave, paid sick leave and redundancy pay.
"This is a fantastic win for clerical workers who work for labour hire firms," said Branch Assistant Secretary Andy Dennard. "Employers in the industry can no longer hide behind their status labour hire organisations to deny their employees the right to permanent status and the benefits that go along with it."
"As far as we are aware this is the first decision of its kind in Australia and it is an important step towards gaining the right to permanent employment for all long-term labour hire employees," he continued.
"For far too long labour hire has been used as device to keep employees in a state of indefinite casual employment regardless of the true nature and length of their employment. Hopefully this decision marks the beginning of the end of such practices," Mr Dennard said.

Building Industry


Building Industry Taskforce
What new laws mean for building workers

The Howard Government has legislated to give the Building Industry Taskforce new powers to deal with industrial relations issues in the building industry.

These Powers are:

  • Power to demand that documents are handed over;
  • Power to compel inforamation be given or questons be answered (under oath).

This means that ordinary workers can be served with a notice which forces them to appear before the Taskforce and be questioned about a workplace issue.

No Right to Silence

These interrogation sessions are held in private and you may be told that you have to answer questions under oath. You have no 'right to be silent'.
You can be directed not to disclose to anyone (other than you lawyer) what was discussed during your interrogation.
There is no protection from self-incrimination; you must answer questions even if the answers might tend to incriminate you.
Failure to comply is a criminal offence and penalties from a  $3,300 fine to 6 months imprisonment.

These attacks on Building Workers will be spread to attacks on all if the Government is able to use these laws

ONLINE USERS
Online Users:
Members:
0
Anonymous: 4

   
   
AWAs Cut Pay

Govt's Own Research Shows AWAs Remove Conditions and Cut Take-Home Pay

ACTU Media Release 13 June 2006

The Howard Government is ignoring official data that shows individual work contracts (AWAs) are being extensively used under the new IR laws to cut the take home pay of workers and to axe penalty rates, shift allowances and annual leave loading.

ACTU Secretary Greg Combet said today:

"By supporting AWA individual contracts Employment Minister Kevin Andrews is trying to defend the indefensible.

The fact is that AWA individual contracts are clearly designed by the Howard Government to undermine the pay and conditions that are laid down in the various industrial awards.

The Howard Government's new IR laws expressly allow employers to get rid of penalty rates, shift allowances, overtime payments, leave loading, public holiday pay, meal breaks and other important entitlements.

This is what has happened to new Spotlight employees and this is what is happening across the board with AWA individual contracts under the new IR laws.

A senior Government official reported to the Parliament two weeks ago that every individual contract (AWA) registered under the new laws has taken away at least one protected award condition. The Head of the Office of the Employment Advocate Mr McIlwain has told a Senate Estimates Committee:

  • Annual leave loading has been erased in almost two thirds (64%) of Australian Workplace Agreements (AWAs) lodged under the new laws
  • Penalty rates have disappeared in almost two out of three agreements (63%)
  • Shift allowances have been removed in more than half of all new agreements (52%)
  • One in six (16%) agreements have dropped all award conditions -- replacing them with just the Government's five minimum conditions
  • Four out of ten (40%) agreements have dropped gazetted public holidays
  • More than one in five new individual contracts (22%) contain no pay increases over the life of the agreement (AWA).

"These results are in line with previous experience of AWA-style individual contracts in Western Australia. A study of the WA experience in four key labour-intensive industries found that 75% of WA individual contracts contained no pay increase, 67% did not have overtime rates and 74% contained no weekend penalties (ACIRRT, Sydney University).

Also, ABS data shows that the hourly rate of pay for non-managerial employees on AWA individual contracts is lower than that for workers on collective agreements (ABS 6306).

Recent polling by the ACTU in 24 key marginal seats also showed strong community opposition to individual contracts with 70% believing that individual contracts give too much power to the employer.

The Howard Government may be in line with the opinions of big business on its IR laws but it is greatly out of step with community opinion," said Mr Combet.

More information:


Back


Page registered by Administrator Victorian Branch on 15/06/06 05:06 for topic NEWS UPDATE.
This page has been read 582 times
PrintSend to a friend
© 2002 - oxiigen - life support for business - all rights reserved - POWERED BY CHILLI CMS
Terms and conditions - Privacy Policy

archive site by farnham street neighbourhood learning centre