This is an AMIEU archive site
Click here for the current AMIEU website
Unfair Dismissal


Howard offers token amount for sacked workers

Howard is promising workers who are sacked unlawfully will have access to a $4000 legal fund to fight their dismissal - effectively an admission that workers will be worse off under the new legislation
He outlined the provisions for the handout in Perth on Thursday 29/09/05), which will cover only a fraction of the estimated $25,000 cost of mounting an 'unlawful termination' action in the courts.
Current laws protect workers from 'unfair dismissal' - being sacked for no reason or an unfair reason. Unfair dismissal hearings are conducted by the Australian Industrial Relations Commission, are heard quickly with minimum costs and do not require the presence of lawyers.
Under the proposed legislation up to 4 million Australian workers will be denied this protection and could be forced to go through lengthy court cases to determine if they have been treated unlawfully.
Also, if they lose they could be forced to pay the costs of their former employer.
If the new laws are passed up to 4 million Australian workers will have no protection from unfair dismissal.

Casuals


Casuals are conscripts, not volunteers

 

Most casual workers are not casual by choice and would prefer to be in ongoing employment, according to a new report.

 

Find out more about the report findings

Good News for Labour Hire Workers


ASU wins right to permanency for labour hire employees

In a ground breaking decision handed down recently by the South Australian Industrial Commission the ASU SA & NT Branch has won a long running battle to gain the right for long term labour hire employees to convert to permanent employment.

In his decision Commissioner Dangerfield found that two ASU members employed by Direct Personnel to work for Transport SA on a long term basis, were entitled to be considered permanent employees and therefore gain access to Award entitlements such as paid annual leave, paid sick leave and redundancy pay.
"This is a fantastic win for clerical workers who work for labour hire firms," said Branch Assistant Secretary Andy Dennard. "Employers in the industry can no longer hide behind their status labour hire organisations to deny their employees the right to permanent status and the benefits that go along with it."
"As far as we are aware this is the first decision of its kind in Australia and it is an important step towards gaining the right to permanent employment for all long-term labour hire employees," he continued.
"For far too long labour hire has been used as device to keep employees in a state of indefinite casual employment regardless of the true nature and length of their employment. Hopefully this decision marks the beginning of the end of such practices," Mr Dennard said.

Building Industry


Building Industry Taskforce
What new laws mean for building workers

The Howard Government has legislated to give the Building Industry Taskforce new powers to deal with industrial relations issues in the building industry.

These Powers are:

  • Power to demand that documents are handed over;
  • Power to compel inforamation be given or questons be answered (under oath).

This means that ordinary workers can be served with a notice which forces them to appear before the Taskforce and be questioned about a workplace issue.

No Right to Silence

These interrogation sessions are held in private and you may be told that you have to answer questions under oath. You have no 'right to be silent'.
You can be directed not to disclose to anyone (other than you lawyer) what was discussed during your interrogation.
There is no protection from self-incrimination; you must answer questions even if the answers might tend to incriminate you.
Failure to comply is a criminal offence and penalties from a  $3,300 fine to 6 months imprisonment.

These attacks on Building Workers will be spread to attacks on all if the Government is able to use these laws

ONLINE USERS
Online Users:
Members:
0
Anonymous: 4

   
   
Building Workers

Building Workers Threatened

By Brian Boyd, VTHC Secretary 18 July 2006
Workers in the building industry can expect to be threatened with jail if they don't answer questions from the quasi - industrial police force, the Australian Building and Construction Commission (ABCC).

Brodene Wardley CFMEU member, is a single mother of 3 and a crane driver at the Roche Mining project near Hamilton in western Victoria.  She is also the occupational health and safety representative.

She was a rank and file speaker at the last trade union (ACTU/VTHC) National Day of Protest in Melbourne on the 28th June. However, her story started last April when she received a letter from the ABCC telling her she would be jailed unless she appeared before the draconian policing body for the Industry, to answer questions about her fellow work mates, who took industrial action in September the previous year.

The action occurred after a minibus containing 10 Roche workers was nearly hit by a train at a level crossing near the site.  The crossing had no warning lights, only a give way sign.

The workers called a stop-work meeting, arguing the only way to convince the company to address their concerns was to withdraw their labour.  Roche took the workers to the Industrial Relations Commission, where an agreement was negotiated.  Safety improvements were made at the crossing and the workers went back to work.

Wardley believed the issue was behind her until contacted by ABCC investigators to appear at the Portland Magistrates Court on May1.

"I was threatened with six months' jail if I didn't appear", she told the media recently.  "I was threatened with six months' jail if I didn't answer questions. If I speak about what happened in the courtroom, I can be threatened with jail or a fine".

Wardley was interviewed for almost four hours.  The hearing was closed to all except ABCC staff and her lawyer.  She was compelled to answer all questions, warned if she prevaricated, and was also required to produce documents.  She has no right to silence, even on the grounds of self-incrimination, a normal legal right.  If she refused to co-operate, she could be jailed.  She could not discuss any detail with her friends or family, including her children.

"I was treated with less respect than a criminal or murderer or drug dealer," she says. "I couldn't believe it.

"How far are these people going to be allowed to go? They just can't treat people like this.  Not in Australia.  We're in Australia, for god's sake."

Her lawyer whose clients include a group of Melbourne terror suspects has said the legal provisions in the building industry have been adapted from ASIO legislation!

Wardley's lawyer has said the secrecy provisions in the anti- union Building Industry legislation is only found in counter terrorism, underworld murder, drug importation or corrupt police procedures!

The Federal Government set aside $123 million dollars for ABCC operations against Australian building workers.  The ABCC director John Lloyd intends to increase his staff from 110 to 150.

The ABCC has recently taken action against more than 100 workers on the WA Perth- Mandurah rail project because they stood by a sacked shop steward.


Back


Page registered by Administrator Victorian Branch on 25/07/06 09:19 for topic NEWS UPDATE.
This page has been read 586 times
PrintSend to a friend
© 2002 - oxiigen - life support for business - all rights reserved - POWERED BY CHILLI CMS
Terms and conditions - Privacy Policy

archive site by farnham street neighbourhood learning centre