Howard Govt IR Agency Confirms Cowra Sackings and Pay Cuts Legal ACTU Media Release 07 July 2006
Australian workers can be legally sacked and re-employed on lower wages and conditions under the Howard Govt's new IR laws the Government's own workplace watchdog has confirmed today.
The Office of Workplace Services has today released a report that confirms that it was legal for the Cowra abattoir to, as it did in early April, propose sacking 29 meatworkers and re-employ them on wages that involved pay cuts of around 30% or up to $180 week lower.
ACTU Secretary Greg Combet said today:
"The Office of Workplace Services report clearly confirms what the ACTU and unions have being saying about these laws all along - they leave Australian workers exposed to the threat of being legally sacked and offered their jobs back on lower wages.
The Prime Minister is wrong to claim that the OWS report shows that the Cowra abattoir sackings could have occurred under the previous IR laws.
This is another deliberate attempt by the Prime Minister John Howard and the Employment Minister Kevin Andrews to deceive the Australian public.
John Howard and Kevin Andrews are simply trying to escape responsibility for the fact that under their new IR laws it is possible to sack people and re-employ them on lower wages and conditions.
The OWS investigation released today only examines the actions of the Cowra abattoir under the new IR laws. It does not consider the legality of the Cowra abattoir sackings under the previous IR legislation.
The ACTU has previously called on the Howard Government to immediately repeal the 'Cowra Clauses' that allow these practices from the new industrial relations laws.
Previously workers had been protected by laws which prohibited sackings if one of the reasons for the dismissal was that the worker was entitled to certain pay and conditions under an industrial award or agreement. This law stopped employers from being able to sack their employees and replace them with workers on lower terms and conditions.
But Section 792 (4) of the Government's new laws specifically waters down these protections and only provides protection to workers where it can be proven that the 'sole' or 'dominant' reason for a dismissal was that the worker was entitled to certain pay and conditions under an industrial award or agreement. This change has significantly watered down previous protections for workers against being sacked and replaced by workers on lower wages and conditions.
In addition, Section 643 (8) of the new industrial relations laws protects big businesses from any unfair dismissal claim where a worker is sacked for so called 'operational reasons'. No such exemption existed under the previous industrial relations laws.
|