This is an AMIEU archive site
Click here for the current AMIEU website
Unfair Dismissal


Howard offers token amount for sacked workers

Howard is promising workers who are sacked unlawfully will have access to a $4000 legal fund to fight their dismissal - effectively an admission that workers will be worse off under the new legislation
He outlined the provisions for the handout in Perth on Thursday 29/09/05), which will cover only a fraction of the estimated $25,000 cost of mounting an 'unlawful termination' action in the courts.
Current laws protect workers from 'unfair dismissal' - being sacked for no reason or an unfair reason. Unfair dismissal hearings are conducted by the Australian Industrial Relations Commission, are heard quickly with minimum costs and do not require the presence of lawyers.
Under the proposed legislation up to 4 million Australian workers will be denied this protection and could be forced to go through lengthy court cases to determine if they have been treated unlawfully.
Also, if they lose they could be forced to pay the costs of their former employer.
If the new laws are passed up to 4 million Australian workers will have no protection from unfair dismissal.

Casuals


Casuals are conscripts, not volunteers

 

Most casual workers are not casual by choice and would prefer to be in ongoing employment, according to a new report.

 

Find out more about the report findings

Good News for Labour Hire Workers


ASU wins right to permanency for labour hire employees

In a ground breaking decision handed down recently by the South Australian Industrial Commission the ASU SA & NT Branch has won a long running battle to gain the right for long term labour hire employees to convert to permanent employment.

In his decision Commissioner Dangerfield found that two ASU members employed by Direct Personnel to work for Transport SA on a long term basis, were entitled to be considered permanent employees and therefore gain access to Award entitlements such as paid annual leave, paid sick leave and redundancy pay.
"This is a fantastic win for clerical workers who work for labour hire firms," said Branch Assistant Secretary Andy Dennard. "Employers in the industry can no longer hide behind their status labour hire organisations to deny their employees the right to permanent status and the benefits that go along with it."
"As far as we are aware this is the first decision of its kind in Australia and it is an important step towards gaining the right to permanent employment for all long-term labour hire employees," he continued.
"For far too long labour hire has been used as device to keep employees in a state of indefinite casual employment regardless of the true nature and length of their employment. Hopefully this decision marks the beginning of the end of such practices," Mr Dennard said.

Building Industry


Building Industry Taskforce
What new laws mean for building workers

The Howard Government has legislated to give the Building Industry Taskforce new powers to deal with industrial relations issues in the building industry.

These Powers are:

  • Power to demand that documents are handed over;
  • Power to compel inforamation be given or questons be answered (under oath).

This means that ordinary workers can be served with a notice which forces them to appear before the Taskforce and be questioned about a workplace issue.

No Right to Silence

These interrogation sessions are held in private and you may be told that you have to answer questions under oath. You have no 'right to be silent'.
You can be directed not to disclose to anyone (other than you lawyer) what was discussed during your interrogation.
There is no protection from self-incrimination; you must answer questions even if the answers might tend to incriminate you.
Failure to comply is a criminal offence and penalties from a  $3,300 fine to 6 months imprisonment.

These attacks on Building Workers will be spread to attacks on all if the Government is able to use these laws

ONLINE USERS
Online Users:
Members:
0
Anonymous: 4

   
   
Cowra Sackings Legal

Howard Govt IR Agency Confirms Cowra Sackings and Pay Cuts Legal

ACTU Media Release 07 July 2006

Australian workers can be legally sacked and re-employed on lower wages and conditions under the Howard Govt's new IR laws the Government's own workplace watchdog has confirmed today.

The Office of Workplace Services has today released a report that confirms that it was legal for the Cowra abattoir to, as it did in early April, propose sacking 29 meatworkers and re-employ them on wages that involved pay cuts of around 30% or up to $180 week lower.

ACTU Secretary Greg Combet said today:

"The Office of Workplace Services report clearly confirms what the ACTU and unions have being saying about these laws all along - they leave Australian workers exposed to the threat of being legally sacked and offered their jobs back on lower wages.

The Prime Minister is wrong to claim that the OWS report shows that the Cowra abattoir sackings could have occurred under the previous IR laws.

This is another deliberate attempt by the Prime Minister John Howard and the Employment Minister Kevin Andrews to deceive the Australian public.

John Howard and Kevin Andrews are simply trying to escape responsibility for the fact that under their new IR laws it is possible to sack people and re-employ them on lower wages and conditions.

The OWS investigation released today only examines the actions of the Cowra abattoir under the new IR laws. It does not consider the legality of the Cowra abattoir sackings under the previous IR legislation.

The ACTU has previously called on the Howard Government to immediately repeal the 'Cowra Clauses' that allow these practices from the new industrial relations laws.

Previously workers had been protected by laws which prohibited sackings if one of the reasons for the dismissal was that the worker was entitled to certain pay and conditions under an industrial award or agreement. This law stopped employers from being able to sack their employees and replace them with workers on lower terms and conditions.

But Section 792 (4) of the Government's new laws specifically waters down these protections and only provides protection to workers where it can be proven that the 'sole' or 'dominant' reason for a dismissal was that the worker was entitled to certain pay and conditions under an industrial award or agreement. This change has significantly watered down previous protections for workers against being sacked and replaced by workers on lower wages and conditions.

In addition, Section 643 (8) of the new industrial relations laws protects big businesses from any unfair dismissal claim where a worker is sacked for so called 'operational reasons'. No such exemption existed under the previous industrial relations laws.


Back


Page registered by Administrator Victorian Branch on 10/07/06 04:05 for topic NEWS UPDATE.
This page has been read 590 times
PrintSend to a friend
© 2002 - oxiigen - life support for business - all rights reserved - POWERED BY CHILLI CMS
Terms and conditions - Privacy Policy

archive site by farnham street neighbourhood learning centre